Seth
and His Descendants Part Two
Genealogy
of the Believing Race, through Seth
(Based
on Genesis Chapter 5)
By
Alfred Eldersheim
Edited
by Doktor Riktor Von Zhades
ONE
purpose of Scripture has now been fulfilled. The tendencies for evil
of the Cainite race have been traced to their full unfolding, and
"the kingdom of this world" has appeared in its real
character. (Read John 18:36; 2 Corinthians 4:4) On the other hand,
the race of Seth have gathered around an open profession of their
faith in the promises, and of their purpose to serve God, and they
have on this ground separated themselves from the Cainites. The two
ways* are clearly marked out, and the character of those who
walk in them determined. There is, therefore, no further need to
follow the history of the Cainites, and Scripture turns from them to
give us an account of "the elders" who "by faith"
"obtained a good report." (Read Hebrews Chapter 11)
At
first sight it seems as if the narrative here opened with only a
"book," or account, "of the generations of Adam,"
containing here and there a brief notice interspersed; but in truth
it is otherwise. At the outset we mark, as a significant contrast,
that whereas we read of Adam that "in the likeness of God made
He him," it is now added that "he begat a son in his own
likeness, after his image." Adam was created pure and sinless in
the likeness of God; Seth inherited the fallen nature of his father.
Next, we observe how all the genealogies, from Adam downwards, have
this in common, that they give first the age of the father at the
birth of his eldest son,** then the number of years which each of
them lived after that event, and finally their total age at the time
of death. Altogether, ten "elders" are named from the
creation to the time of the flood, and thus grouped:***
Column
1 - Names; Column 2 - Age at Birth of Son; Column 3 - Number of years
after that event; Column 4 - Total Age; Column 5 - Year of Birth from
Creation; Column 6 - Year of Death from Creation.
On
examining them more closely, what strikes us in these genealogical
records of the Patriarchs is, that the details they furnish are
wanting in the history of the Cainites, where simply the birth of
seven generations are mentioned, viz.: Adam, Cain, Enoch, Irad,
Mehajael, Methusael, Lamech, and his sons. The reason of this
difference is, that whereas the Cainites had really no future, the
Sethites, who "called upon the name of Jehovah," were
destined to carry out the purpose of God in grace unto the end. Next,
in two cases the same names occur in the two races - Enoch and
Lamech. But in both, Scripture furnishes characteristic distinctions
between them. In opposition to the Enoch after whom Cain called his
city, we have the Sethite Enoch, "who walked with God, and was
not; for God took him;" and in contradistinction to the Cainite
Lamech, with his boastful ode to his sword, we have the other Lamech,
who called his son Noah, "saying, This same shall comfort us
concerning our work and toil of our hands, because of the ground
which Jehovah hath cursed." Thus the similarity of their names
only brings out the more clearly the contrast of their character.
Finally, as the wickedness of the one race comes out most fully in
Lamech, who stands seventh in the genealogy of the Cainites, so does
the godliness of the other in Enoch, who equally stands seventh in
that of the Sethites.
Passing
from this comparison of the two genealogies to the table of the
Sethites, we are reminded of the saying, that these primeval
genealogies are "monuments alike of the faithfulness of God in
the fulfillment of His promise, and of the faith and patience of the
fathers." Every generation lived its appointed time; they
transmitted the promise to their sons; and then, having finished
their course, they all "died in faith, not having received the
promises, but having seen them afar off, and were persuaded of them,
and embraced them, and confessed that they were strangers and
pilgrims on the earth." That is absolutely all we know of the
majority of them. But the emphatic and seemingly needless repetition
in each case of the words, "And he died," with which every
genealogy closes, tells us that "death reigned from Adam unto
Moses," (Read Romans 5:14) with all the lessons which it
conveyed of its origin in sin, and of its conquest by the second
Adam. Only one exception occurs to this general rule - in the case of
Enoch;**** when, instead of the usual brief notice how many
years he "lived" after the birth of his son, we read that
"he walked with God after he begat Methuselah three hundred
years;" and instead of the simple closing statement that "he
died," we are not only a second time told that "Enoch
walked with God," but also that "he was not; for God took
him." Thus both his life and his translation are connected with
his "walk with God." This expression is unique in
Scripture, and except in reference to Noah (Read Genesis 6:9) only
occurs again in connection with the priest's intercourse with God in
the holy place. (Read Malachi 2:6) Thus it indicates a peculiarly
intimate, close, and personal converse with Jehovah. Alike the life,
the work, and the removal of Enoch are thus explained in the Epistle
to the Hebrews: "By faith Enoch was translated that he should
not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him: for
before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God."
(Read Hebrews 11:5) His translation was like that of Elijah (Read 2
Kings 2:10), and like what that of the saints shall be at the second
coming of our blessed Lord. (Read 1 Corinthians 15:51, 52) In this
connection it is very remarkable that Enoch "prophesied" of
the very thing which was manifested in his own case, "saying,
Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of His saints, to execute
judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of
all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all
their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against
Him."*****
When
Enoch was "translated" only Adam had as yet died: Seth,
Enos, Cainan, Mahalaleel, and Jared were still alive. On the other
hand, not only Methuselah, the son of Enoch, but also his grandson
Lamech, who at the time was one hundred and thirteen years old, must
have witnessed his removal. Noah was not yet born. But how deep on
the godly men of that period was the impression produced by the
prophecy of Enoch, and by what we may call its anticipatory and
typical fulfillment in his translation, appears from the circumstance
that Lamech gave to his son, who was born sixty-nine years after the
translation of Enoch, the name of Noah - "rest" or
"comfort" - "saying, This same shall comfort us
concerning our work and toil of our hands, because of the ground
which Jehovah hath cursed." Evidently Lamech felt the burden of
toil upon an earth which God had cursed, and looked forward to a
gracious deliverance from the misery and corruption existing in
consequence of it, by the fulfillment of the Divine promise
concerning the Deliverer. In longing hope of this he called his son
Noah. A change, indeed, did come; but it was by the destruction of
that sinful generation, and by the commencement of a new period in
the covenant-history. We mark that, in the case of Noah, Scripture no
longer mentions, as before, only one son; but it gives us the names
of the three sons of Noah, to show that henceforth the one line was
to divide into three, which were to become the founders of human
history.
It
is most instructive, also, to notice that Enoch, who seems to have
walked nearest to God, only lived on earth altogether three hundred
and sixty-five years - less than half the time of those who preceded
and who succeeded him. An extraordinary length of life may be a
blessing, as affording space for repentance and grace; but in
reference to those most dear to God, it may be shortened as a relief
from the work and toil which sin has brought upon this world. Indeed,
the sequel will show that the extraordinary duration of life, though
necessary at the first, yet by no means proved a source of good to a
wicked and corrupt generation.
*Consider
Proverbs Chapters 2, 3, 5, 7, 8 - Dr. RVZ
**
With the exception of Seth, who, of course, was not the eldest son of
Adam.
*** Such are the
numbers according to the Hebrew text. There are differences between
this and the Greek translation of the so-called LXX (the Septuagint),
and also the Samaritan text. For further particulars we refer to
chapter 10, where also the difference between the chronologies of
Ussher and Hales is explained.
**** It might also
be suggested that Melchizedek could be considered in the same
accounting for we find no record of his birth, nor death, except that
he was a righteous man after God’s own heart. - Neither His
Father, nor His Mother were written of in the tribal annals; and
neither the beginning of His days, nor the end of His Life were
written of, except of as those in the likeness of the Son of Allaha,
(Aramaic for God) thus his Kingly Priesthood is established forever.
(literal translation: “to the end of the universe - Hebrews 7:3 AE
Translation - Dr. RVZ
***** Jude 14, 15.
This quite accords with what was generally known about Enoch. One of
the Old Testament apocryphal works, written before the time of Christ
(Read Ecclesiasticus 44:16), has it that "Enoch was translated,
being an example of repentance to all generations;" while
another book (B. of En. i. 9) expressly states, that he prophesied
the coming of the Lord for judgment upon the ungodly.
No comments:
Post a Comment